VISIT ▻ shop.philosop-HER.com
The field is anchored by several foundational concepts that moved the needle from "men's history" to a critical analysis of gendered power.
Proposed by R.W. Connell in the seminal work Masculinities (1995), this is arguably the most influential concept in the field.
Definition: It is the configuration of gender practice which embodies the currently accepted answer to the problem of the legitimacy of patriarchy.
The Hierarchy: Connell argues that masculinities do not exist in a vacuum but in a hierarchy. Hegemonic masculinity sits at the top, subordinating not only women but also "marginalized" masculinities (based on race or class) and "subordinated" masculinities (such as gay identities).
Drawing from Judith Butler’s theory of gender performativity (Gender Trouble, 1990), masculinity is viewed as a repeated "act" rather than an internal essence.
Erving Goffman also contributed by discussing the "front" men must maintain to appear competent and dominant.
Michael Kimmel, in Manhood in America (1996), argues that masculinity is often a "homosocial enactment" (men perform for the approval of other men, driven by the fear of being seen as unmanly or "feminine").
Masculinities Studies does not seek to "defend" or "attack" men. Instead, it functions as a critical tool to understand how patriarchy functions as a system that harms women while simultaneously policing and restricting the emotional and social lives of men.
The field has expanded significantly to address how being a man intersects with other identities.
Crisis of Masculinity: Scholars like Eric Anderson and Michael Messner have explored the "crisis" narrative, investigating how shifts in the global economy and the rise of women’s rights have challenged traditional male roles, leading to "inclusive masculinity" or, conversely, a "retributive" return to dominance.
Intersectionality: Modern scholarship emphasizes that there is no singular "masculinity". A Black working-class man, a white corporate executive, and a trans man experience gender through wildly different lenses of privilege and oppression.
Toxic vs. Healthy Masculinity: While "toxic masculinity" is a popular term, academic sources often prefer the term "protest masculinity" (from Alfred Adler and later Connell) to describe exaggerated claims to virility by men who feel disempowered by their social or economic standing.